Former National Security Adviser (NSA) Col. Mohammed Sambo Dasuki (rtd) is now set to storm the Supreme Court to press for his freedom denied him by the federal government after three different High Courts in Abuja had admitted him to bail in the criminal charges filed against him by the government.
The ex NSA had on Wednesday at the Court of Appeal in Abuja lost his bid to enforce his freedom after he had secured bails on all the charges against him.
Dasuki’s lawyer, Mr. Ahmed Raji, SAN confirmed that appeal papers have been put together to be filed at the Apex Court to challenge the judgement of the Court of Appeal and the High court that gave judgement to the government on the re-arrest after bail.
The SAN said that there are sufficient grounds for his client to approach the Supreme Court to seek the enforcement of his freedom from detention ordered by the federal government after he had been granted bail by three Judges who are prosecuting him on the charges.
Dasuki said that he was not afraid of trial in the charges against him as a former National Security Adviser, but added that the proper thing must be done by the government by respecting the bail granted him lawfully by courts.
He claimed that since government had approached the court in his matter, the same government must be fully ready to abide by the court decisions in the interest of justice and the rule of law.
The ex-NSA had been admitted to bail by three different High Courts in Abuja but he was re-arrested on December 29, 2015 by operatives of the Department of the State Security Service (DSS) on an alleged order of the federal government and had since been held incommunicado.
But the government in its defence in a motion on notice filed in court claimed that Dasuki being a Crown Prince of Sokoto Caliphate had large sympathizers across the length and breadth of the country who may jeopardize his trial if allowed on bail.
Dasuki had asked the High Court and the Court of Appeal to stop the federal government from further prosecuting the criminal charges until the bail granted him is obeyed and also pleaded that the courts should no longer grant indulgence to the federal government having been in contempt of the courts by the refusal to allow him freedom after the bail.
In a unanimous judgement of the full panel of the court delivered by Justice Abdul Northerner, the Appeal Court upheld the submission of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), which put Dasuki on trial, that it was not in contempt of any court order because the re-arrest of the appellant (Dasuki) in December last year was not at its (EFCC) instance.
Justice Northerner said that from the submissions of the appellant counsel, Mr. Joseph Daudu (SAN) and the EFCC counsel, Mr. Rotimi Jacobs (SAN), the bail condition granted Dasuki was perfected on December 29, last year and that a warrant of released to that effect was served on the Comptroller of Prisons in Kuje, upon which he was released.
On his re-arrest by the operatives of the Department of the State Security Service (DSS), the Appeal Court agreed with the Abuja High Court that the re-arrest cannot be turned to a disobedience to its order on bail because the court bail was not targeted at the DSS when it was granted.
The appellate court also said that the EFCC which put Dasuki on trial on criminal charges at the FCT High Court cannot be held responsible for the action of the DSS on the ground that the two agencies are different entities established by different Acts and vested with different powers.
Besides, the appeal court said there was no existing order against the re-arrest of Dasuki and that since there is no existing order, there cannot be a disobedience to a non-existing court order.
The court held that the appellant ought to have established the terms of court order on the bail clearly to indicate in clear terms, the agency that can be held for contempt if the order is violated.
In the appeal, the court said that form 48, which deals with contempt of court, was not served on either EFCC or DSS and as such, the two agencies cannot be held liable for the offense of contempt.
Justice Northerner, therefore, held that there was no violation of any court order either by DSS or EFCC in respect of the bail granted Dasuki on December 18, 2015 and his subsequent re-arrest on December 29, 2015 by DSS operatives, shortly after he perfected his bail condition and secured freedom
The ex NSA had on Wednesday at the Court of Appeal in Abuja lost his bid to enforce his freedom after he had secured bails on all the charges against him.
Dasuki’s lawyer, Mr. Ahmed Raji, SAN confirmed that appeal papers have been put together to be filed at the Apex Court to challenge the judgement of the Court of Appeal and the High court that gave judgement to the government on the re-arrest after bail.
The SAN said that there are sufficient grounds for his client to approach the Supreme Court to seek the enforcement of his freedom from detention ordered by the federal government after he had been granted bail by three Judges who are prosecuting him on the charges.
Dasuki said that he was not afraid of trial in the charges against him as a former National Security Adviser, but added that the proper thing must be done by the government by respecting the bail granted him lawfully by courts.
He claimed that since government had approached the court in his matter, the same government must be fully ready to abide by the court decisions in the interest of justice and the rule of law.
The ex-NSA had been admitted to bail by three different High Courts in Abuja but he was re-arrested on December 29, 2015 by operatives of the Department of the State Security Service (DSS) on an alleged order of the federal government and had since been held incommunicado.
But the government in its defence in a motion on notice filed in court claimed that Dasuki being a Crown Prince of Sokoto Caliphate had large sympathizers across the length and breadth of the country who may jeopardize his trial if allowed on bail.
Dasuki had asked the High Court and the Court of Appeal to stop the federal government from further prosecuting the criminal charges until the bail granted him is obeyed and also pleaded that the courts should no longer grant indulgence to the federal government having been in contempt of the courts by the refusal to allow him freedom after the bail.
In a unanimous judgement of the full panel of the court delivered by Justice Abdul Northerner, the Appeal Court upheld the submission of the Economic and Financial Crimes Commission (EFCC), which put Dasuki on trial, that it was not in contempt of any court order because the re-arrest of the appellant (Dasuki) in December last year was not at its (EFCC) instance.
Justice Northerner said that from the submissions of the appellant counsel, Mr. Joseph Daudu (SAN) and the EFCC counsel, Mr. Rotimi Jacobs (SAN), the bail condition granted Dasuki was perfected on December 29, last year and that a warrant of released to that effect was served on the Comptroller of Prisons in Kuje, upon which he was released.
On his re-arrest by the operatives of the Department of the State Security Service (DSS), the Appeal Court agreed with the Abuja High Court that the re-arrest cannot be turned to a disobedience to its order on bail because the court bail was not targeted at the DSS when it was granted.
The appellate court also said that the EFCC which put Dasuki on trial on criminal charges at the FCT High Court cannot be held responsible for the action of the DSS on the ground that the two agencies are different entities established by different Acts and vested with different powers.
Besides, the appeal court said there was no existing order against the re-arrest of Dasuki and that since there is no existing order, there cannot be a disobedience to a non-existing court order.
The court held that the appellant ought to have established the terms of court order on the bail clearly to indicate in clear terms, the agency that can be held for contempt if the order is violated.
In the appeal, the court said that form 48, which deals with contempt of court, was not served on either EFCC or DSS and as such, the two agencies cannot be held liable for the offense of contempt.
Justice Northerner, therefore, held that there was no violation of any court order either by DSS or EFCC in respect of the bail granted Dasuki on December 18, 2015 and his subsequent re-arrest on December 29, 2015 by DSS operatives, shortly after he perfected his bail condition and secured freedom
Comments
Post a Comment
*We hate vulgarity and abusive words, such will not be condoled here.
*Your comments are appreciated and are moderated, will be published immidiately after admins approval. Feel free to say your mind.
*Are you finding it difficult to comment? Here is a tip for you....
You can Use your Google account to comment, If You don't have a Google account, You can add only Your Name, Click COMMENT AS >> Select NAME/URL >>Put your Name, (Leave URL empty if you don't have a website) >> then Write Your Comment in the Comment box and click Publish.
Thats All. If also you do not wish to comment, you can always click on the Funny, interesting or cool links just below the post, to rate this post according to where you think its falls to...
Note: Comments made on this blog does not refer to blog's owner opinion as its commenters opinion on post made here. Thank you